Holy S***
Thursday, June 29, 2006
From CNN:
The Supreme Court rules President Bush overstepped his authority with military war crimes trials for foreigners held at Guantanamo Bay in a case involving a former driver for Osama bin Laden.
Does this mean all the fears of an ultraconservative court are reactionary? Clarence Thomas excepted, I think if you put a bunch of justices [...]
by Kevin Makice
A Ph.D student in informatics at Indiana University, Kevin is rich in spirit. He wrestles and reads with his kids, does a hilarious Christian Slater imitation and lights up his wife's days. He thinks deeply about many things, including but not limited to basketball, politics, microblogging, parenting, online communities, complex systems and design theory. He didn't, however, think up this profile.
Related Posts
- The Device that rocks the cradle
CNN reports parents of newborns will soon be getting a better night's sleep, thanks to a robot hand that senses the baby moving and rocks... - PLAYMAKER!
Holy Cow! I did a Google search for Playmaker only as a reference for the previous post, figuring the Internet would be have some small... - Exams of all shapes and sizes
More wisdom from the Peters book: Have a healthy fear of the exams.
There are oral exams, written exams, maybe even a quest for a...
From CNN:
The Supreme Court rules President Bush overstepped his authority with military war crimes trials for foreigners held at Guantanamo Bay in a case involving a former driver for Osama bin Laden.
Does this mean all the fears of an ultraconservative court are reactionary? Clarence Thomas excepted, I think if you put a bunch of justices in a room to deliberate about law, they are going to concern themselves first with precedent and second with constitutionality.